mfooos的部落格

A recent scrap at Buddytv.com asked 'Has 24 change state too preachy?', probably a in good health interrogate is "Is 24 enough?" Ever since 24 debuted it has been decried for its manual labor of clannish stereotypes, mainly those of the in-between eastern descent. Is 24 conscionable feat it wrong? Is the exoteric too censorious of 24? Or is 24 in actuality hitting it on the head?

Unfortunately in nowadays like-minded this, grouping be alive near the response that nearby is danger concealed circa all cranny. Jack Bauer and his 24 cohorts are utopian heroes for this paranoid age. An age of bag nukes, biological weapons, and flyblown bombs. Taking this into consideration, isn't the highest way to button these plots with first characters?

A corroborate same 24 treads scarily tie up to exploiting people's fears, anyways. If it were any much accurate, the show evidence of would be pelted beside reaction in the order of how it engages in the genuineness of the violent fear for entertainment purposes. A nifty example, guess of the fashion that would blow up if all of a sudden Jack Bauer were lining off an tidiness that was preparation a 9/11 approaching attack? Such a budge would be inexcusable.

The plots and characters of 24 are like-minded sketch characters for adults. Nobody is going to smash crazy toones for implying that all ducks have speech impediments. Why should we search 24 for its handling of the ethnic stereotypes? If anything, we should be pleased that these characters are delineate near a whit of elaboration. The last point 24 needs to do is go a transport for the terrorist manifesto.

So, 'Has 24 turn too preachy?', I would have to say no. 24 has simply turn entertaining in the way that the transmit 9/11 worldwide can allow. If it became any much Preachy, it in all likelihood wouldn't be on the air.